A few days ago The New York Times published an article on a supposedly Old Masters decreasing  of value: Can the Old Masters Be Relevant Again? which took me by surprise.

Today I found this graphic in  The Economist Magazine that illustrates a more realistic (at least in my opinion) statistic, some parts are doing well some aren’t, and that is understandable especially because it covers a  broad range of art.

So fear not my fellow followers, good art will always be relevant.